Stava-Murray, Leong both favor gun control, but issue remains contentious in 81st House race

Democratic incumbent Anne Stava-Murray and Republican challenger Paul Leong are both on record as being in favor of gun control legislation, but the issue remains a contentious one in the race for the 81st state House seat.

Stava-Murray, elected in 2018, is a co-sponsor of state legislation to ban high-powered weapons and high-capacity magazines. Leong recently voted in favor of a sale ban on certain high-powered rifles in Naperville as a city councilman.

Despite their stances, each questions the other’s advocacy for the constituents they’d represent in Clarendon Hills, Darien, Downers Grove, Lisle, Naperville, Westmont and Woodridge.

β€œI’m grateful for the councilman’s support of the assault weapons ban at the local level, but there’s nothing to say that he’s going to support a ban at a state level,” Stava-Murray said. β€œGiven what the Republican base has allowed, I’m not sure that he will end up following through on that.”

Leong noted the consistency of his position, referencing a vote he made as a Naperville Unit District 203 board member against arming teachers in the classroom. Leong also questioned the dedication of Democratic state legislators such as Stava-Murray.

β€œThey have failed to pass legislation even though they are in the supermajority,” Leong said. β€œSo if that’s really your passion and if it’s really your sincere desire, I think you could have done it by now.”

Stava-Murray detailed her support for strengthening β€œred flag” laws, universal background checks, a modernization of the Firearm Owner’s Identification card system and increasing focus on mental health.

β€œI stand on my record of standing up for victims of gun violence and listening to victims and what their needs are,” she said. β€œAnd listening to the experts of what our best next steps can be in safety practices for our state.”

In terms of questions about his support of a gun ban at the state level, Leong said he’d repeat the process he used for the Naperville ordinance by researching any legislation before committing.

β€œIn all circumstances, I try to find a compromise where I can try to represent both sides of, especially, a particularly contentious issue,” he said. β€œI’m not going to commit to saying what I’m going to do in any specific case because the cases aren’t specific.”